The Concealed Handgun Manual
Excerpt from Chapter One
VIRGINIA TECH: IN SEARCH OF ANSWERS
According
to the (Virginia Tech Incident Review Panel’s) report, police
officers started to arrive at Norris Hall three minutes after the
university police department received the first call. The officers
were slowed by the chained entrances but eventually found a locked
door to a maintenance shop. They shot the lock with a shotgun and
entered the building. Two police teams entered and ran up the stairs
to the second floor where the shots were coming from. They heard
the last shot as (Seung Hui) Cho shot himself in the head ending
the worst massacre by a gunman on a U.S. university campus.
The panel’s
report estimates that between 9:40 and 9:51, Cho shot and killed
twenty-five students and five faculty members in the hallway and
in four of the classrooms. He wounded seventeen other students.
Immediately
the local and national media were all over the incident like blowflies
on a dead cow in August. They concentrated on the victims, on the
university and police response, on Cho’s obvious mental problems,
and that the country obviously needed more gun control laws. There
were comparisons to the shooting in 1999 at Columbine High School
in Littleton, Colorado, in which two students killed twelve students
and a teacher before shooting themselves.
They were
aided and abetted in calling for more gun control laws by the usual
suspects – the
Brady Campaign to Prevent Handgun Violence (Formerly Handgun Control,
Inc.), the Violence Policy Center, and other anti-gun and anti-self-defense
groups.
Although
the media and anti-gun organizations responses were predictable,
the political response was muted. It was interesting and encouraging
that after the shooting many politicians kept their mouths shut about
gun control, saying it was too early or inappropriate to raise the
issue. Many Democratic politicians have been stung by the party’s enthusiasm for disarming law-abiding citizens.
After prompting by former President Clinton, they have come to realize
that gun control likely cost the Democrats control of Congress and the Presidency.
It is an issue they don’t want to deal with.
Newsweek noticed the hush from Democrats in the wake of
Virginia Tech. Even such rabid anti-gun politicians as Illinois Congressman
Rahm Emanuel didn’t
want to talk about gun control anymore than he wanted to talk about
term limits for congressmen. The Democrats recruited some pro gun
politicians to run for Congress in 2006 and were trying the court
gun owners, albeit with their fingers crossed.
The response
from the pro gun, pro self-defense citizens and organizations was
also predictable. The feedback I heard again and again from people
interested in taking responsibility for their own safety was: “If
only one student there had had a gun . . .”
But Virginia Tech
was a “gun-free zone.” Even students
and faculty members with concealed handgun licenses were forbidden
to take their guns on campus. In 2005, a student with a concealed
handgun permit was disciplined for bringing a gun on campus.
For more
than two years, the Virginia Citizens Defense League had been trying
to get a law passed in the legislature that would prevent public
colleges and universities from banning guns from their campuses.
The bills were stalled in committee after much lobbying by Virginia
Tech and other institutes of higher learning in the state.
Apparently
Virginia Tech spokesman Larry Hincker was pleased the bill in 2006
was defeated. He was quoted in The Roanoke Times as
saying: “I'm sure the university community is appreciative
of the General Assembly’s actions because this will help parents,
students, faculty, and visitors feel safe on our campus.”
Right.
In
the days and weeks after the Virginia Tech shooting some people spoke
in favor of allowing students and faculty members who have concealed
handgun licenses to carry handguns on campus just as they can off
campus.
Texas Governor
Rick Perry was quoted as saying that Texans with concealed handgun
licenses should be able to carry anywhere. He included college campuses,
bars, courthouses, and churches.
Suzanna
Gratia Hupp who saw her parents killed in the mass shooting at Killeen,
Texas, in 1991, told a reporter from Time magazine that
she puts some of the blame for Virginia Tech on politicians. She
was angry because the shooting was preventable, she said.
“The
politicians haven’t figured it out. They have created gun-free
zones, and all of the dreadful things that have happened were in
these gun-free zones,” Hupp
told the reporter.
Hupp’s
story is told in Chapter 3.
Alan Gottlieb,
chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear
Arms, agreed. He said that every tragic school shooting and some
other mass shootings had one thing in common.
“They
all happened in so-called ‘gun-free zones,’” he
said. “You
can pass all the laws you want, but the only proven way to stop shootings
in ‘gun-free
zones’ is an armed response.”
Sheriff
Wayne Rausch of Latah County, Idaho, favors more law-abiding citizens,
including adult students, getting permits to carry concealed handguns.
However he has experienced occasions when permit holders have hindered
police while intending to help. In most cases permit holders should
use their guns only to defend themselves or their families, he says.
“An
active shooter situation is certainly an example of an exception where I would
like to see the armed citizen get involved,” Rausch said. “Because
one of the questions that was posed to me by many of the people that called
was: ‘What could law enforcement have done differently at Virginia Tech?’
“Quite frankly I’ve spoken to a lot of my fellow sheriffs
and chiefs and we all agree: basically nothing. It’s absolutely
ludicrous to think that on a huge campus like that when there is
an isolated incident going on that is not only dynamic but changing
fast that somehow or another police are miraculously going to be
able to pinpoint the exact location and have immediate response to
shut it down before it gets worse. That’s just not feasible;
that’s just not going to happen.”
Rausch feels
that the most reasonable expectation is that law enforcement is probably
going to get the information about a shooting by someone calling
on a cell phone. When police are alerted, they go there and take
care of it as quickly as possible.
“On
the other hand, the quickest answer to this obviously is that if you’ve
got a classroom full of students and you are lining them up to shoot them and
some of them are armed themselves, there is a possibility this may be shut
down much quicker.”
He says
the deterrent factor of some students being armed should not be discounted.
“It
seems to me that there must be some sort of intimidation factor for the bad
guy – that if I know I am among an armed populace, I could be picking
a fight with someone who is going to kill me.”
The University
of Idaho with a student body of ten thousand is located in Latah
County and the city of Moscow. Rausch says the university has a policy
of no guns on campus but the state attorney general was trying to
determine if the policy was legal.
While some
colleges and universities have not banned students or faculty with
permits from carrying concealed handguns on campus, one state has
tackled the issue head on. Utah has fought the battle against such
bans in the courts and so far has won.
In 2006,
the Utah Supreme Court upheld a law passed by the legislature in
2004 that requires public colleges and universities to honor concealed
handgun permits on campus. No mass shootings have been reported at
Utah colleges since the law went into effect.
The Virginia
Tech Incident Review Panel’s report stated that data on the
effect of carrying guns on campus are “incomplete and inconclusive.”
“The
panel knows of no case in which a shooter in campus homicides has
been shot or scared off by a student or faculty member with a weapon.”
However,
in an appendix that lists school mass shootings, the report notes
two cases where this happened.
One
of the incidents mentioned happened five years before and only a
hundred miles west of the Virginia Tech campus. Another foreign-born
student went on a shooting rampage on January 16, 2002, this time
at the Appalachian School of Law, near Grundy, Virginia.
When Tracy
Bridges and his friends got back to the law school after lunch they
were late so Bridges parked his Chevrolet Tahoe in a faculty spot
near one of the exits from the classroom building. He and the friends
with him climbed the stairs to the second floor and entered the classroom.
About fifteen students were waiting in the room for the professor
to arrive.
Bridges,
twenty-five, was in his third and final year at the law school. He
was also certified as a peace officer in North Carolina and was a
deputy with the Buncombe County sheriff’s office in the far
western part of that state.
The students
were talking among themselves when they heard what could have been
a shot, Bridges said. One of the students in the class was Ted Besen,
another third-year student who had been a law enforcement officer
also in North Carolina.
“We
both kinda looked at each other and kinda jokingly said that sounded
like a gunshot. And then when we heard the second and third; that’s
when we knew it was a gunshot,” Bridges said.
He and Besen
ran into the hallway where they saw Professor Wesley Shinn who, according
to Bridges, told them: “Peter’s in the building and he’s
got a gun.”
Excerpt from Chapter Two
VICTIMS OR SURVIVORS: FIGHTING BACK AGAINST
CRIMINALS AND TERRORISTS
Bill Stroud was a Baptist Youth Minister when he took over the Tool
House (in Shreveport, Louisiana) from his father. In early December
2000, the area suffered from a rash of armed robberies, he said.
Although his store wasn’t hit, one incident concerned him.
He was working behind the counter when a man came in and started
talking to one of his employees while standing behind him.
“I’m not the kind of guy to read people, but I thought
that my employee must know the guy ‘cause of the way the guy
was talking to him,” Stroud said.
He saw the employee step to one side and point at the store’s
video security camera. The man made some excuse about going to get
his drill and left. When the employee came over and told him what
had happened, Stroud was concerned enough to call the police. The
police found the man who was carrying a .357-caliber revolver and
several bags of crack cocaine, Stroud said. They arrested him.
Later Stroud told his father and other family members about the
incident, so they would be aware of the possible dangers. He also
bought several handguns and hid them in the store with one behind
the counter.
Just before Christmas that year, Stroud’s second cousin was
raped and murdered during a car-jacking incident in southern Louisiana.
“It was a very bad situation that was sort of on the heels
of all this. So that’s when we got our guns and started being
prepared ‘cause there were a lot of robberies,” he said. “I
had guns previously, but now they are stashed where I can get to
one.”
Several months later, in the early summer of 2001, Stroud had a
particularly disturbing dream. He dreamt that he was in his store
when a man came in and shot at him. He fired one round in return
and the man shot again.
“In this dream, I saw something fly out of my chest, so I
looked down and didn’t feel anything, but there was blood coming
out of my chest. And I died. I woke up at the point that I died,” Stroud
said.
The dream upset him to the point that he told his pastor about it.
The pastor suggested that God was trying to tell him something – that
perhaps he was going to get robbed, Stroud said.
Nothing happened for about a month, until Friday, July 20, 2001.
Shortly before 5 p.m., Stroud was behind the counter working on a
report. One employee was also behind the counter, sitting on the
floor counting drill bits. Another was over in a corner behind some
toolboxes. Stroud said he had just finished talking to Jerry Wilson,
a customer and off-duty police officer from nearby Bossier City.
Wilson, who was unarmed at the time, was looking at a jointer planer,
they had been discussing, Stroud said.
His wife would have been working
behind the counter but they had adopted a baby two weeks before
and she was at home, he said.
A man entered the store. Wilson later
described him as a black male, about 17 years old, five feet six
inches tall, weighing about 135 pounds. He was wearing a dark blue
print shirt, dark blue golfer type ball cap. He was holding a dark
blue or black bandana or “do-rag” to his face covering
his mouth and nose. Stroud was conscious that a man had entered the
store and was making a lot of noise.
“When I’m working,
I like tune out the world,” Stroud said. “I was doing
my work, not paying attention or even looking up for a minute.
I was thinking: as soon as I get to where I need to be I’m
gonna see what this loud customer wants.”
When finally, Stroud
did look up the man was about eight feet away pointing a .38-caliber
snub-nose revolver at him and yelling at him that he wanted the
money from the cash register.
“He was obviously on drugs,
upset at how I was ignoring him, and about to explode. So when
I looked up, he had that gun on me. I thought he was going to shoot
us all.”
Stroud
had an Arminius .357 Magnum caliber revolver loaded with .38 Special
+P cartridges just under the counter. He picked up the gun just
as Wilson, the police officer, made a movement. Wilson later told
investigators that the would-be robber pointed the gun at him and
told him not to move. He said that the man yelled at Stroud that
if he didn’t
give him all the money, he would shoot him (Wilson). The distraction
gave Stroud time to cock the gun and bring it up.
“When
I pulled my gun up, he started coming at me, and when he did,
I didn’t
aim or nothing – boom. When I did that, he shot and hit
the wall,” Stroud said.
He dove down behind the counter
on top of the employee who had been counting drill bits. When
Stroud got up he was in time to see the robber running out of
the door.
“I
shot over his head deliberately, wanting him out of my store,” he
said. That bullet shattered a window in the front of the store.
At
the time, Stroud didn’t know whether his first shot
had hit the man or not. After he had gone, Stroud did find the
revolver the man had dropped in his haste to leave. The robber
was later identified as 19-year-old Deandre Lias, according to
police reports. He was picked up by two friends and driven to
Louisiana State University Medical Center where they dropped
him off.
Stroud’s bullet
had hit him in the center of the chest between his nipples, according
to the police report. He died shortly after his arrival at the
hospital. His friends told police Lias had been hanging out with
them and had gone to get a hamburger. When he didn’t return
they had gone looking for him. When they found him walking along
the street, he was patting his chest with both hands and staggering.
One of the friends told police he thought Lias was playing around
but he collapsed into the car and said: “Carry me to the
hospital. I been shot, and go get my mama.”
Lias was known
to several of the police officers involved in the subsequent
investigation. At the time of his demise, he was a fugitive,
wanted on a warrant for a charge of attempted murder. He was
also a suspect in seven armed robberies in the previous month,
according to the police report.
The district attorney determined
the shooting was a justifiable homicide and Stroud was not
charged.
Excerpt from Chapter Ten
WINNING A GUNFIGHT: MIND-SET AND TACTICS
Jim
Eichelberg ran a trapline of vending machines in northwest Houston.
He serviced these machines early in the morning before the traffic
got too heavy. He often had a few thousand dollars on him from
the vending machines, so he had a Texas concealed-handgun license
and usually carried a gun. The gun was a snub-nosed Smith & Wesson
Model 37 five-shot revolver which weighed 13.5 ounces. In it he
carried MagSafe rounds in .38 caliber. These rounds kick less than
regular ammunition in the light gun and are designed to fragment
on contact so they won’t go through three apartment walls and
hit a little old lady two rooms away. Eichelberg had been shooting
most of his life. He practiced with his father-in-law at least once
a week, he said.
That morning, he left his home about 5 a.m. when
it was still dark and started his route. About 5:45 a.m., the 49-year-old
Eichelberg was driving his 1985 Ford van east on Milwee towards
the Northwest Freeway. Just before he reached the stop sign at the
freeway service road, he passed a man walking in the direction he
was driving.
Eichelberg pulled up at the stop sign and waited for
the traffic to clear on the service road. As he waited, he looked
in his rearview mirror but he couldn’t see the man he had just
passed. Wondering why the man had disappeared, Eichelberg looked
at the rearview mirror on the passenger side. He saw the man running
along the passenger side of the van. The man was holding a revolver
in his right hand.
“You could see that gun. It was almost like there was a spotlight
on it because the street light down the street was reflecting off
that gun,” Eichelberg said. “I got a real good look at
that gun.”
Eichelberg had no doubt that the man was going to
try to rob him or hijack his van. His gun was on the floor of the
vehicle under his jacket and a mass of paperwork. He groped desperately
for the gun. By the time he found it, the man was yelling at him
through the passenger door window.
“He had his face against
the window. His nose was almost touching it and he had the gun
next to his head,” Eichelberg said.
The man was later identified
as James Turner, 32, a skinny black parolee who was dressed all
in black. Turner was shouting at Eichelberg and pointing the revolver
at him through the window. However, with the noise of the traffic
on the service road and the windows being closed, Eichelberg couldn’t
hear what he was saying.
“I didn’t figure he was there
to sell me newspapers.”
Eichelberg brought his gun up and
fired one shot at Turner.
The window shattered and Turner’s
face disappeared. Eichelberg thought he had hit him but he wasn’t
sure. He was deaf and half-blinded by the explosion of his gun
inside the van. He was aware he was not in a good position if the
man came back so he jumped out of the van. He started running towards
the back of the van, still holding his revolver. Eichelberg was
hoping to put some distance between himself and his would-be attacker.
Turner
apparently had the same idea. He started running back the way he
had come. The two men met at the back of the van…
|